It’s been a rather slow news day so far, and this one is no different. I’m still waiting for the news to be posted about the election in Burma. Until then, I’ll just continue to update you with how the country is doing.
The news on Burma has been pretty bad. Although the election is all but over, the government has not released a single official count. So at this point the government is effectively holding all the cards, so to speak. Some say that it is only a matter of time before the army puts down a rebellion. It is unlikely that this happens, but at the very least it might be a good idea to not get complacent.
I personally think that the government forces would be best served by having the population believe that the election is over. If the government is able to get a few hundred thousand people to vote in favor of the military, then it will start to be seen as legitimate. If the government is able to get a few hundred thousand people to vote against the military, then it will be seen as a coup attempt. The government needs to keep the population thinking that the election is over.
The government needs to keep the population believing that the election is over. But, the military needs to win. A military coup would be extremely dangerous to the security of the country. It would threaten the stability of the country by being able to control the flow of information from the government. If the government is able to keep the population believing the election is over, then the military would take control of the entire news cycle.
The government could use the media to control the population as a way to keep them from making any sort of decision. If the population believes the election is over when the military declares an election, then the government would begin issuing warnings to the population about elections until they happen. And if the government is able to get people to believe the election is over, then the military would start issuing warnings to the population about elections until they happen.
I don’t know about you, but I’m not looking forward to that. At least it doesn’t sound like it does.
I’m sure there are lots of people who think the election is over and who are upset, but I would like to think we would be able to get them to think that it is over, otherwise we would be in a world of hurt. The first time I heard about this idea was in a lecture when the lecturer was talking about how the world would be better off if we all just stopped voting.
While I personally don’t think that voting is a good idea (imho, voting in elections is a massive waste of time that just wastes money and adds to the problems of the world), the idea that the election is over, regardless of whether you vote or not, is still a very popular sentiment.
That sentiment is not really a problem in the UK, where the government is trying to give us a choice in who sits in the Queen’s Royal House of Household. But it is a problem in the US, where the election is held only once every four years, and many people are not even aware that there is a choice. That’s why we are in this “voter-less” world, with all the extra work, hassle, and costs of not having to vote.
The idea is to give people the option of voting for who they choose. The problem is that we don’t have a vote in the US, so that means the people who really have no say in who wins the election are the people who choose to not vote. This is why we have to do this extra work to give more people the choice of voting or not.