Sarah Sanders is definitely a big deal. She has a great story to tell and is doing a good job.
It’s good to see she’s making an effort to do her job well. The problem is that if I were to ask her to write a news conference, I’d probably be given her “news” in the form of a list of her recent interviews. It’s like she does it because she’s afraid that if she doesn’t, her story will be too embarrassing for her to be able to carry on.
Her interview with The Atlantic was pretty good. It was more than just a question and answer session. It was an open discussion about the challenges and opportunities of living in the digital age. The question and answer session is definitely an opportunity for Sanders to speak about the problems that she faces in the current time-warped world. However, I feel that her focus is more on being a good person than being a great journalist.
She’s also been pretty quiet about the big issues facing society, which is something you can’t say about most politicians these days. To be fair, I love Sanders’ honesty, but I also think she’s more interested in being a nice person than being a leader.
The question and answer session this week was Sanders’ first public appearance on the new website since the election, and its an opportunity for her to answer questions from the viewers about the changes that she’s had to make to her life as a journalist. Sanders has been quiet about her feelings about the changes she’s had to face since the election, but the answers she gave today were some of the most honest I’ve seen from her.
You know, the more I see of Sanders, the more I like her. Not only is she a great journalist, but her answers about her life and political life are also very clear and honest. There seems to be a lot of truth in there. She seems like shes just the person out there, and that is refreshing and makes me want to support her more.
I think Sanders has a good chance of winning re-election this year. As a matter of fact, I think she could win re-election to Congress. The Democrats need to get some more women elected to be in the majority. If Sanders just had a women in the Senate, she could push for women’s rights and have a good chance to be in the majority. You can’t vote for a woman if you don’t like her answers.
That’s a good point. Sanders hasn’t had a woman on a national stage, and she’s been the “girl next door” for a long time. She’s also always been a fan of the Obama, so I think she could very well be a very good candidate. I actually think Sanders will get more votes than any other Democrat running for the Senate. In fact, in a poll I did for my own blog, I found that Sanders voters are the most likely to vote for Obama.
Sanders is a very popular politician, and she actually won a lot of votes in 2008, so she shouldn’t be hard to beat. Sanders will be the first woman to be elected governor of her state. But because she is such a hot name in the Democratic presidential race, and she is also a popular figure on the GOP side, that might not be enough for her to win. In the past, the people who favored Sanders have been people who supported the idea of the two-party system.
Sure, a Sanders win would be a big accomplishment, but it still isn’t the same as actual victory. She would be very popular because she’s a strong supporter of the Democratic Party, but she would not be able to beat Obama (who is far more popular among the Republican party) by a large margin.