I love this piece by Lisa S. that I first saw way back in 2009. It is part of the “In The Public Interest” series and is a quick read. It talks about how we are bombarded with advertising and information about ourselves and how important it is to understand what that advertising is telling us.
I also love this piece from the Center For Public Integrity that describes how our own brain is wired in a way that makes it very difficult for us to truly understand how much we are being bombarded with information and how much of it is actually true.
It is important to point out that the internet is a huge, huge place and we are bombarded with advertising all the time. The problem with our brains is that it is hard to understand how much is true and how much is not.
The internet is the biggest information source on the planet. It’s hard to avoid all of it, and our brains are wired to notice when something we shouldn’t be seeing is. This is why even when we go on vacation to the Dominican Republic, we read a list of all the tourist attractions in the country. The website for the Dominican Waterfall website includes not only the waterfall itself, but a listing of all the other waterfalls that are nearby.
So the website of a waterfall is actually a site that looks like it could be taken down if it were to be taken down, but of course that doesn’t stop it from having multiple pages for the same place. It is the perfect example of how things can be both true and false at the same time.
The site of the Dominican Waterfall was taken down in 2012 because it had been hacked. But the website of the waterfall was not taken down. In 2013 a hacker stole the original source code to the website, which he then repurposed into a number of other websites, including The Dominican Waterfall. The site of the waterfall then had yet another origin. It was the site of the waterfall that was hacked.
This time, the hacker used the original website of the waterfall to get the source code of a website that had been hacked. The site at the site was taken down, but the hacker had access to everything up to the point of the original hack.
This is just a new form of theft. When we first saw these websites, we were skeptical because, well, we have no idea who did this. We had no idea what this site was about either. But now we know that it was the original site that had been hacked and the original source code that had been stolen. The hacker is the anonymous hacker and our main suspect is the mysterious hacker.
Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker. Our main suspect is the mysterious hacker.
I’ve been wondering if there’s a hidden meaning to this cryptic message. It’s hard to say, but it seems to have something to do with the fact that it was left behind by the mysterious hacker, who is apparently a master of disguise.
